|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 16, 2018 11:59:27 GMT -5
Lifestyle can be a powerful marketing theme. People value the freedom to do what they want and when they want. Is diabetes putting an damper on your life?
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 16, 2018 10:07:08 GMT -5
mnholdem, You ever post/publish on SA ;-) And you really need to forward this to Mike C. and Dr. Kendall. I was also thinking of publishing an article, "MannKind Prepares to Release Nearly 20 Years of Clinical Data" which would highlight remarks made by CEO Castagna and CMO David Kendall at recent conferences, highlighting Dr. Kendall's lung safety presentation scheduled for the upcoming EASD.
In my opinion, MannKind should be regularly issuing press releases like this for dissemination to media outlets. No company is permitted to pay for favorable press coverage, but MannKind can certainly tailor messages about Afrezza and TreT through press releases. Media outlets in both the medical and investment communities are always looking for stories to fill their pages and press releases work just fine. Sometimes reporters even call to get more information.
It's an area that I hope MannKind's new marketing director doesn't ignore. Used effectively, press releases can be terrific tools.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 16, 2018 7:44:04 GMT -5
It's mine, although I have to admit that I've recently begun to consider publishing again. It's been quite a number of years for me.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 16, 2018 7:23:55 GMT -5
For decades, studies have conclusively demonstrated that early intensive insulin therapy administered to newly-diagnosed Type 2 diabetes patients can result in remission of the disease. One meta-analysis report, conducted more than a decade ago and involving over 3,000 patients, demonstrated results of nearly 50% of patients who underwent early intensive insulin therapy achieving drug-free remission for up to two years. Clinical data has also demonstrated that early intensive insulin therapy has resulted in a significant reduction of insulin resistance, a common precursor of Type 2 diabetes.
In a clinical study by Model Clinical Research LLC, Baltimore MD, in collaboration with MannKind Corporation, investigators are seeking to demonstrate that the addition of mealtime Afrezza (aka Technosphere Insulin) can significantly lower HbA1c within 3 months in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes patients initially having HbA1c of 7.5 or higher, despite at least 6 months of prior therapy with diabetes medications.
The trial protocol instructs patients to follow a weekly Treat-to-Target BG Testing Regimen and make Afrezza dose changes according to an Afrezza Titration Algorithm.
In spite of growing clinical evidence that early initiation of insulin therapy has repeatedly demonstrated significant results, including complete remission of the disease, the American Diabetes Association still has insulin therapy as the last step in its Diabetes Standards of Care.
In early stages of Type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance and other factors often causes the pancreas to become over-stressed and unable to keep up with the body's demand for insulin. In layman's terms, the beta cells in the pancreas begin to wear out. Critics of the ADA and the AACE are becoming increasingly vocal in their dissent against the recommendation within the ADA's Standard of Care which advocates early treatment of diabetes with oral medications, such as Metformin, stating that Metformin does nothing to assist the pancreas or improve its ability to produce sufficient levels of insulin. Early intensive insulin therapy, on the other hand, can provide a respite to the over-stressed pancreas by providing much-needed insulin and enabling the pancreas to recuperated and generate new insulin-producing beta cells at a rate that will meet the body's demand while, at the same time, lowering insulin resistance.
Recently, the American Diabetes Association announced changes that would enable the organization to more rapidly response to scientific discoveries for the treatment of diabetes, stating in a press release that, "Beginning with the 2018 ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, the Standards document will be a “living” document where notable updates are incorporated into the Standards, as determined appropriate by the Professional Practice Committee, noting that their decades-long practice of annually reviewing medical advances would be replaced with more frequent updates, what they described as a "living" Standards of Care, in response to important events such as "new treatments with the potential to impact patient care" and publication of new findings "that support a change to a recommendation and/or evidence level of a recommendation".
Many critics of the ADA are advocating that there is now more than sufficient clinical evidence to meet the ADA's criteria to update its Standard of Care to move short-term intensive insulin therapy to the first step in treating early diabetes. It's hard to argue with results and the incredible potential of this therapy, its puzzling why the ADA has taken so long to advocate early short-term insulin therapy as a first step in combatting this disease. I know of no other treatment that has the potential of remission of diabetes for 50% of treated patients.
Delaying this therapy may result in continuous deterioration of the pancreas to the point where it is no longer repairable and sentences the patient to a difficult life of continuously fighting diabetes. It's a fight that can be won with a 1st Round knockout. It's time for the American Diabetes Association and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists to recognize this important treatment and to put it in its proper place in the 2019 ADA Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.
The clinical trial, entitled "Initiating Mealtime Ultra-Rapid Acting Insulin (Afrezza) in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Patients" is scheduled to be completed in September 2018.
Trial Link: clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03324776?term=mannkind&recrs=abdfg&rank=3
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 14, 2018 19:12:53 GMT -5
Will more Buy recommendations follow Wainwright's?
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 14, 2018 8:28:06 GMT -5
Really flawed rebuttal Matt. Where did Mike mention MannKind’s value in regards to a M&A? He’s referring to MannKind’s being undervalued in terms of today’s stock price.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 10, 2018 14:30:54 GMT -5
Tutes rarely provide analyst coverage but they do buy <$5 stock, usually for their small cap funds.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 10, 2018 14:23:00 GMT -5
Unfortunately, I don't think this will affect the Afrezza label. It's a different formulation, so MannKind would have to do clinical trials all over again to prove its safety and efficacy. It does bode well for future drugs though.
Having said that, MannKind can also initiate trials of their existing Afrezza formulation to prove that room-storage temperature doesn't affect Technosphere Insulin, but the clinical trials would be lengthy and expensive. MN, you certainly know how to burst a girl’s (my) bubble. 😢 How do you know that it wouldn’t apply to Afrezza? Is it because of the particle size? Sorry to be a heartbreaker. The chemicals used to make the particles is different.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 10, 2018 12:12:46 GMT -5
Unfortunately, I don't think this will affect the Afrezza label. It's a different formulation, so MannKind would have to do clinical trials all over again to prove its safety and efficacy. It does bode well for future drugs though.
Having said that, MannKind can also initiate trials of their existing Afrezza formulation to prove that room-storage temperature doesn't affect Technosphere Insulin, but the clinical trials would be lengthy and expensive.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 10, 2018 11:32:42 GMT -5
You've removed a few few of my postings that I felt were relevant to MNKD. Obviously, you didn't agree and you remove them without comment. It makes me wonder how many other postings have been removed that I or others might have found interesting or relevant.
I think your goal should be balance and not biased in one direction.
I'm starting to think you're now the opposing position of Seeking Alpha were my positive MNKD postings never see the light of day.
Give it some thought.
Perhaps you are referring to your posting of this morning's announcement that Ontario-based Aralez Pharmaceuticals entered an agreement to sell its assets to two separate companies, Nuvo Pharmaceuticals and Deerfield Management Companies, as it files for bankruptcy.
The event has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with MannKind Corporation. Even the title of your thread "No Parallels, Please" attest to this face. Perhaps you can locate a stock discussion board for Aralez or Nuvo and post it there?
Thank you!
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 10, 2018 11:10:07 GMT -5
Application Date: January 13, 2018 Publication Date: August 9, 2018
Application Number: 15885416
(US20180221280) HEAT-STABLE DRY POWDER PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS
Excerpt:
SUMMARY
The present disclosure provides dry powder compositions for inhalation which are stable at room temperature or higher temperatures for prolonged periods of time without substantially losing their biological activity. In one embodiment, a pharmaceutical formulation is provided comprising a dry powder for inhalation comprising a biologic molecule, wherein the biologic molecule comprises a peptide or a protein for systemic delivery using a dry powder inhalation system comprising an inhaler that can be used with a unit dose cartridge or capsule for multiple use, a single use inhaler with an integrally built-in container for single use, or a multi-dose inhaler provided with a plurality of doses integrally configured with the inhaler.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Drug delivery to the lungs offers many advantages. It is difficult to deliver drugs into the lungs due to problems in transporting the drugs past natural physical barriers in a uniform volume and weight of the drug and the drug physical and chemical characteristics. Disclosed herein are heat-stable formulations comprising, a buffer, including, citrate, and a monovalent, or divalent cation, and one or more pharmaceutically acceptable carriers and/or excipients. Embodiments disclosed herein show that the dry powder formulations are stable at high heat and humidity and thus they facilitate and overcome the storage and refrigeration challenges posed by prior art formulations. A method of making the dry powder composition for extended storage at temperatures greater than 20° C. and humid environments is also provided.
Source: patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=US224374923&recNum=1&maxRec=1114&office=&prevFilter=&sortOption=Pub+Date+Desc&queryString=FP%3A%28mannkind%29&tab=PCTDescription
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 9, 2018 17:02:11 GMT -5
My understanding of your scenario is, yes, if 1000 shares are available to short then they could do that and they could buy back, short, buy back forever provided they still had access to 1000 shares. The interest calculation is the same as if you were long on margin. Lending to short is on a one to one basis. The same share cannot be lent out to more than one sale at a time. Otherwise, you could drive the price to near zero by creating an infinite supply of shares. To avoid getting 2 sets of 1000 mixed up, let's change it to covering 1000 shares and having 2000 shares found for borrowing. The covering 1000 shares (buying) would lower the number of shorted shares to 9000. 2000 shares would still be borrowed in the account, giving 9000-2000=7000 still naked shorted. The 2000 shares borrowed just sit there and don't get counted twice. The brokerage or market maker still has to deal with the other 7000. Your comments around very short-term naked trading are, I think valid, but they work both ways. You can, for example, sell naked puts which is kind of like "naked long exposure" (what a term). Much of this comes from brokerages taking on a bit of risk (naked short exposure) to facilitate making trades for their clients, which is what brokerages make money on. Your comment makes reference to interest charges, etc. All of these fees are what keep the lights on at the brokerage. Also, there are two sides to every coin. Covering those 1000 shares could put upward pressure on the stock price, and you might not be able to buy all of them at the lower price. More importantly, if the share price drops below a price point where many shorts / longs have decided would be a good cover / entry point, a stock's fall can be blunted and even have the price buoyed. Sort of like the opposite of when upward momentum in share price loses steam due to profit taking by longs. It doesn't work like that. If ten fund managers find 10,000 shares available at 10am, you effectively have 100,000 (10,000 x 10 shares) available. SEC doesn't mandate real time.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 9, 2018 7:46:40 GMT -5
As hard as it's been on shareholders and the company, I applaud Mike's strategy to pay down the debt and be free of that onerous burden. SOmething our country could learn a lesson frm.Heh (and I do not care about the typo.) liane is a doctor...you should see her handwriting!
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 9, 2018 7:35:15 GMT -5
Satisfying the Deerfield debt would return MannKind's assets to the company, putting it on much more favorable footing for non-dilutive financing to fund future drug development. Alfred Mann secured $100 million in financing from Deerfield many years ago when MannKind was still a startup biotechnology drug development company and all of the company's intellectual property, patents, technosphere drug candidates, and even the manufacturing facility in Danbury were put up as collateral.
I would think, now that company's Technosphere pulmonary drug delivery technology is proving itself and becoming more valuable, that MannKind will no longer give up 100% of its assets as security for non-dilutive funding (assuming the Deerfield debt is first satisfied) and will selectively choose which assets will be used as security.
For example, if MannKind were to secure financing to fund development of more API, then the rights to the new drugs would serve as collateral but NOT the intellectual property underlying its technology.
With only $23 million principle remaining on the Deerfield Notes (Tranches 1, 4 and B) it's entirely possible for a venture capitalist, investment firm or pharmaceutical company to buy into MannKind, pay off the Deerfield debt and secure intellectual rights to drugs (commercial or development) which it believes have potential to become big revenue-generators. It's a company's assets which give it leverage in the financial markets. As long as Deerfield holds first right to all MannKind's asset, the CFO doesn't have the leverage needed to secure future funding at favorable terms.
It's quite possible that an announcement of an Agreement, where a 'white knight' steps forward to fund MannKind's future, could indeed cause a short squeeze, particularly if it were to provide MannKind with 2 years of runway for expanding commercialization of Afrezza and expanding development of more Techosphere API in its pipeline.
|
|
|
Post by mnholdem on Aug 9, 2018 7:06:24 GMT -5
United Therapeutics Announces Settlement Of Patent Litigation With Watson Laboratories, Inc. Relating To Tyvaso
SILVER SPRING, Md. and RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C., Aug. 8, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- United Therapeutics Corporation (NASDAQ: UTHR) announced today that it has entered into a Settlement Agreement with Watson Laboratories, Inc. ("Watson") resolving ongoing litigation concerning certain patents relating to United Therapeutics' product, Tyvaso® (treprostinil) Inhalation Solution, and Watson's Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") seeking approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to market a generic version of Tyvaso.
Under the Settlement Agreement, United Therapeutics granted to Watson a license under its patent rights to manufacture and commercialize the generic version of Tyvaso described in its ANDA filing in the United States beginning on January 1, 2026, although Watson may be permitted to enter the market earlier under certain circumstances.
The license included in the Settlement Agreement does not permit Watson to manufacture a generic version of any other United Therapeutics product, such as Remodulin® (treprostinil) Injection or Orenitram® (treprostinil) Extended-Release Tablets. The Settlement Agreement does not grant Watson any rights other than those required to launch Watson's generic version of Tyvaso.
In accordance with the Settlement Agreement, the parties will submit the Settlement Agreement to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice for review and will also terminate the pending litigation concerning patents relating to Watson's ANDA.
Source: www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/united-therapeutics-announces-settlement-of-patent-litigation-with-watson-laboratories-inc-relating-to-tyvaso-300694453.html
---
No commercialization of generic Tyvaso until 2026. That gives MannKind plenty of time to commercialize its Trepostinil Technosphere (TreT), which outperformed Tyvaso in Phase 1 testing. MannKind's Phase 3 clinical trial for TreT is scheduled to begin in the 2nd half of 2018.
|
|