|
Post by lakers on Aug 14, 2019 12:54:21 GMT -5
Mnkd made a strategic mistake for not allowing Sanofi buying 10% stake in 2014. Mnkd would have huge cash to dev pipeline. Al was over confident on Afrezza with bad Label. Sanofi would have expanded more effort on Afrezza. Al didn’t diversify. Don’t think Mnkd will make the same mistake again. 10% for $50M or 20% for $100M to dev pipeline ? If UTHR is smart, they would offer to acquire Mnkd in whole. TS is very critical to their future dominance. They have a golden chance to avoid paying large royalties in the future and to attack new markets such as CBD, CF,... by paying a reasonable price upfront. Mnkd would become an R&D and manufacturing arm of UTHR.
UTHR would out license Afrezza for a manufacturing contract and royalty to partially recoup the deal.
TS is the goose which lays golden eggs they are after, not Afrezza.
I don’t know how much Mnkd would be willing to accept if UTHR offers. In this market, based on Kevinmik’s findings, my guess is $750M - $1B.
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Aug 7, 2019 18:14:10 GMT -5
• MannKind (NASDAQ:MNKD) Q2 results: • Revenues: $15.0M (+285%); Afrezza sales: $6.1M (+62% yoy and +20% sequentially). • Net loss: ($12.4M); loss/share: ($0.07). • Yesterday, the company inked an agreement with Apollo Investment Corp. and MidCap Financial Trust for a $75M secured loan facility maturing on August 1, 2024. The company drew $40M at closing. It also negotiated exchange agreements with each of its creditors in order to pay off and/or restructure its existing debt obligations. • Shares up 8% to $1.21 after hours.
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Apr 6, 2019 15:04:42 GMT -5
Interesting SO’s discussion. Your thoughts?
“Over the last month, many diabetes advocates were excited to see Congress get involved in the pricing of insulin via various hearings. That is great news for diabetics, but less than thrilling news for investors. The big players in insulin have responded with various cost-cutting measures. This dynamic makes life more difficult for Afrezza. With the price gap between Afrezza and other treatments getting bigger, it becomes more challenging for consumers to make the leap to a premium product. Many long-term MannKind investors reveled in seeing big pharma get slapped about on Capitol Hill, but that is in many ways a hollow victory in terms of your investment. It is clear that Afrezza cannot match the cost-cutting ability of the bigger and more established players. If Afrezza is forced into fighting a pricing battle, it will be tough sledding.
The flip side of that discussion might be whether or not Afrezza in the hands of others can open a window to a revenue driver for that entity. There could be a sound argument for Afrezza commanding premium prices that insulates a big player from getting slapped around. It is a tough argument to make, as the consumer market has spoken pretty loudly with low sales, but it is possible that some move could happen.“
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Apr 6, 2019 14:08:44 GMT -5
From SO “As stated, the bad news about the warrants not being exercised is that the company does need the money. The good news is that this will free up 14 million shares which are now unencumbered. That gives the company some leeway to perhaps address debt and interest payments to Deerfield with shares rather than using much needed cash. It might be possible for the company to address the Deerfield issue with 7 million shares or so. This would preserve over $13 million in cash, and extend the cash runway into Q4. If the company can get another $12.5 million milestone related to Dryvaso or even a $15 million milestone related to another UTHR compound, it could be enough breathing room to get to the last week in December to get to the $40 million which could be raised on the $1.60 warrants. That could get the company into Q2 of next year. It is still cutting things quite close, but a path does exist.” seekingalpha.com/amp/article/4253095-mannkind-afrezza-scripts-jump-close-quarter
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Mar 31, 2019 13:50:37 GMT -5
SO had the final word bailing out MC (strange bed fellow). MC couldn’t have explained better than this. MC simply needs to reiterate the following at 1Q19 CC and ASM. Can we all get along? ✌️ With Elon Musk latest episode using Twitter, of course MC should stay social media silent. Don’t blame him. It is renewing the current shelf. It is not dilution unless the company authorizes new shares, and that requires shareholder approval. At this point it's a nothing burger. MannKind has 280,000,000 authorized shares, and of that number, there are 187,774,030 outstanding. That leaves the company with 92,225,970 shares to work with. Of that number, the following have been spoken for: .......... Shares authorized 280M Shares accounted for 275,197,874 Shares available 4,802,126 As you can see, the shelf is virtually empty of shares. Any person assessing this situation realistically understands that having no shares on the shelf could create a number of issues. Some analysts believe that the 14 million shares tied to the $2.38 warrants would get exercised. That has not been my belief. With a bit over a week to go, I would think that most people think these shares getting exercised is not likely. If they are not exercised, the 14,000,000 shares associated with them will come back to the shelf. That would give the company 18.8 million shares to work with. Given the cash situation at the company, it is my belief that MannKind will negotiate again with Deerfield to handle interest and principal with shares. With some quick numbers, I see that interest and principal due to Deerfield in the next few months total about $13.5 million. If we assume that the company is able to issue shares at $1.75 in lieu of cash, the matter would require 7.7 million shares. This would leave 11.1 million shares on the shelf, whilst preserving much needed cash. The next shares that could become available are the warrants at $1.60 which expire in December. There are 26.67 million shares tied to those warrants. Here is the catch 22. If exercised, the shelf remains virtually empty of shares. If not exercised, the company gets that back, but it essentially means that the stock is trading at a level most shareholders do not want to see at that stage. The Mann Group has 21.9 million shares tied to its debt. That equates to a conversion price of $4 per share. With the equity trading at under $2 per share, and the debt due in two years, it is not a foregone conclusion that the stock will be at a price point where conversion can be assumed. As early as Q3 of this year, the Street will begin to focus on that debt maturity. MannKind should, at some point in the not too distant future, begin to negotiate with the Mann Group on this debt. Those negotiations could extend that debt to a later date, as well as set a new conversion price to convert the debt to shares. Having only 11 million shares on the shelf to work with makes such negotiations difficult. The bottom line is simple. Shares on the shelf is responsible business. In my opinion, it is not a question of if more shares are sought; it is a question of when. Yes, shares on the shelf allow for possible dilution, but investors in this equity simply need to be aware that the cash situation and debt markets virtually guarantee that shares will be used in an attempt to get this company over its hurdles. seekingalpha.com/article/4251922-mannkind-annual-meeting-afrezza-scripts-cash
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 22, 2019 16:40:14 GMT -5
I think at this immediate moment the money isn't there. However after the December offering there is another $42 million in warrants sitting out there which I reckon gets exercised at some point. Undisclosed pipeline molecule = $30M This corroborates the CTO. Milestone A is $12.5 million Milestone B is $12.5 million Milestone C is $12.5 million Milestone D is $12.5 million Milestone E is $15 million Milestone F is $15 million Milestone Payments (A) through (D) shall be made no more than once (and each only upon the first achievement of the corresponding milestone), irrespective of how many Products achieve the corresponding milestone. Milestone Payments (E) and (F) above may be paid more than once (i.e., if there are multiple Optioned Agents), but each shall be paid only once for the first Optioned Product for each Optioned Agent that reaches the corresponding milestone. MC mentioning $37.5 M over 18 mos refered to A+B+C. UTHR mentioned $25M payment in 2019 = A+B $25M payment in 2020 = C+D Each Undisclosed pipeline molecule if brought forward = $30M = E+F Plus low teen royalty. There can be multiple $30M payments if there are multiple undisclosed molecules and brought forward. The info dovetailed. No more ambiguity. Can we settle this once and for all, SO?
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 22, 2019 15:13:43 GMT -5
I don’t think they have any intention on doing a long-term study and matt and aged know that. Cost is too high. At least at this point in time. Unless we get a partner the long trial data is water under the bridge.. we all know this. So yeah, I have no idea why they keep bringing it up or why they are even here. I believe MNKD is trying to attract a partner or investor.. while at the same time trying to build scripts.. and market our pipeline and technosphere.. that's the plan.. Public info: “We have been working diligently with our partner in Brazil and regulatory authorities to secure our first approval outside the U.S. and hope to have an update for you on this surely as the holidays slowed down our review unfortunately. We need to finish our part one of our pediatric program to file what is known as a PIP in the EU before we can engage in a meaningful filing application for Europe. We anticipate filing in Canada in the first half of 2019 and meeting with the European regulatory authorities to start a [indiscernible] over there as these are the two most common places where we get requests for Afrezza from our international inquiries.We know it takes time to gain regulatory approval in these markets and we’ll make appropriate call to look for one go-to-partner ex-U.S. or continue to find key partners in each market like we did with Brazil and India.”
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 22, 2019 15:03:31 GMT -5
I don’t think they have any intention on doing a long-term study and matt and aged know that. Cost is too high. At least at this point in time. Doing that right now would bankrupt the co. Of course, they know that but keep harping on their genius idea as though Mnkd had several hundred millions dollars budget. Perhaps, that’s exactly what they want.... ulterior motives? The OOC T2 Study, If successful, will render ST (Step Therapy) requirement moot, allow MDs to forgo ST, and coverage plans to drop ST requirement for Afrezza. This study is a very useful, great tool to negotiate for better insurance coverage, and will contribute directly to Afrezza proliferation. Primary Outcome Measures : Percentage change from baseline HbA1c [ Time Frame: 3 months ] Demonstrate that the addition of mealtime Afrezza can significantly lower HbA1c within 3 months in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes patients initially having HbA1c of 7.5 or higher, despite at least 6 months of prior therapy with diabetes medications. Secondary Outcome Measures : Percentage of patients having HbA1c under 7% [ Time Frame: 3 months ] Percent of time that Blood glucose (BG) is under 70 mg/dL on CGMS [ Time Frame: 3 months ]
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 22, 2019 4:11:30 GMT -5
You ain’t see nothing yet. “We anticipate our pediatric program to be Phase III ready by the end of 2019. We also expect a few additional readouts this year from our One Drop study as well as our investigator trial type 2 patients with Dr. Phil Levine in Baltimore. We’re excited to see the interim analysis presented at the upcoming scientific conferences in 2019.” The other trial is significant bc it measures A1C using adaptive Afrezza titration algorithm (ATA) on out of control T2 who have used other RAAs for at least 6 months. Think of it as speeding up Time To A1C Target (TTT). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03324776?term=Afrezza&rank=1Brief Summary: To examine the effects of adding prandial Afrezza inhaled insulin to patients with type 2 diabetes who are not controlled after at least 6 months of other diabetes treatments including oral agents, basal insulin, or GLP-1 use. Detailed Description: Clinical inertia in intensifying treatment of type 2 diabetes patients occurs in the range of 70% in numerous real world database assessments. The investigator proposes treating patients with Afrezza who have an index HbA1c between 7.5% and 11.5% despite being treated with diabetes medications for at least 6 months. The response to Afrezza will be assessed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems (CGMS) studies and initial and follow-up HbA1cs. The goal is to assess how the investigator can rapidly and safely initiate intensification in this patient population, where extensive delays in HbA1c improvement often occur.Afrezza Inhalant Product Patients will be instructed to follow a Weekly Treat-to-Target BG Testing Regimen and make Afrezza dose changes according to an Afrezza Titration Algorithm. Primary Outcome Measures : Percentage change from baseline HbA1c [ Time Frame: 3 months ] Demonstrate that the addition of mealtime Afrezza can significantly lower HbA1c within 3 months in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes patients initially having HbA1c of 7.5 or higher, despite at least 6 months of prior therapy with diabetes medications. Secondary Outcome Measures : Percentage of patients having HbA1c under 7% [ Time Frame: 3 months ] Demonstrate that the addition of mealtime Afrezza can significantly lower HbA1c within 3 months in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes patients initially having HbA1c of 7.5 or higher, despite at least 6 months of prior therapy with diabetes medications. Percent of time that Blood glucose (BG) is under 70 mg/dL on CGMS [ Time Frame: 3 months ] Demonstrate that the addition of mealtime Afrezza can lower blood glucose in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes patients.
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 8, 2019 18:50:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 6, 2019 2:04:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 4, 2019 1:40:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 2, 2019 11:24:51 GMT -5
United licensed MannKind's dry powder formulation of treprostinil, and has the option to collaborate on additional active pharmaceutical ingredients. United licensed Arena's ralinepag for $950 million, and has the option to create an inhalable formulation for an additional $250 million using MannKind’s Technosphere. MannKind's drug delivery platform will likely be applied to United’s currently approved medications, and compounds in development generating revenues for both companies. www.google.com/amp/s/seekingalpha.com/amp/article/4223623-closer-inspection-collaboration-mannkind-united-therapeuticsOn September 3, 2018, MannKind and United Therapeutics also entered into a research agreement (the “Research Agreement”) for the conduct of research by MannKind in connection with multiple potential products, including evaluating the feasibility of preparing a dry powder formulation of a compound within additional classes of active ingredients (outside the scope of the License Agreement) for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. MannKind received an upfront payment of $10 million in consideration for its performance under the Research Agreement. In addition, United Therapeutics, at its option, may obtain a license to develop, manufacture and commercialize products based on specified compounds within the drug classes covered by the Research Agreement (the “Option”). Each specified compound advanced into development and commercialization under such a license would be subject to the payment to MannKind of additional milestone payments of up to $30 million and a low double-digit royalty on net sales of such products. The Research Agreement will terminate in the event that United Therapeutics does not exercise the Option within five years following the date of the Research Agreement, or in the event United Therapeutics exercises the Option and the parties enter into a separate license agreement as contemplated by the Option. United Therapeutics may terminate the Research Agreement without cause upon 30 days’ prior written notice to MannKind, and either party may terminate the Research Agreement in the event of liquidation, bankruptcy or insolvency of the other party. secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FilingID=12951922&RcvdDate=9/6/2018&CoName=MANNKIND%20CORP&FormType=8-K&View=htmlMilestone A is $12.5 million Milestone B is $12.5 million Milestone C is $12.5 million Milestone D is $12.5 million Milestone E is $15 million Milestone F is $15 million Milestone Payments (A) through (D) shall be made no more than once (and each only upon the first achievement of the corresponding milestone), irrespective of how many Products achieve the corresponding milestone. Milestone Payments (E) and (F) above may be paid more than once (i.e., if there are multiple Optioned Agents), but each shall be paid only once for the first Optioned Product for each Optioned Agent that reaches the corresponding milestone. No unachieved Milestone Payments shall accrue and be due if notice has been given by United Therapeutics for termination of the Agreement seekingalpha.com/article/4218970 A+B+C+D = $50M for Trep-T which may have multiple products. E+F = $30M per first Optioned Product for each Optioned Agent which may spawn multiple products. MC mentioned $37.5 M over 18 mos refered to A+B+C.
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 1, 2019 21:14:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by lakers on Feb 1, 2019 21:07:02 GMT -5
|
|